Default feeds, visible likes, autoplay and notifications at any time of the day. These are the features through which creator and brand content reaches American teenagers, and under the settlement Meta will switch them off or move them into a safety mode within several months.
Payments spread over ten years, with no admission of guilt
Meta will pay up to $16.68 billion, paid off in annual instalments over ten years. The settlement closes lawsuits brought by dozens of US states, which argued that Facebook and Instagram were designed to be addictive for young users.
The deal was announced by a coalition of 51 attorneys general led by California's Rob Bonta. Meta admits no wrongdoing, and the court still has to approve the settlement.
Across the related agreements, one report puts the total at up to $18 billion. Around 70%, roughly $12.7 billion, is a guaranteed base. The remaining sum of about $5.3 billion depends on rival platforms adopting similar rules.
What changes for accounts under 18
The changes described in the settlement target default settings. Accounts of users under 18 will get a preset two-hour daily limit, after which the app locks, and a night block between midnight and six in the morning. Only a parent can allow either of these.
Meta will mute most notifications overnight and during school hours, from eight in the morning to three in the afternoon. It will hide like and reaction counts from teenagers, ban beauty filters and “cosmetic procedure” filters, and offer a switch to a non-personalised feed as well as the option to turn off autoplay. It will strengthen age verification and remove accounts of children under thirteen.
Meta is to introduce the non-personalised feed within four months, broader measures within six, and the most demanding age verification within a year.
Meta wants this to become the industry standard
The toughest part of the settlement is conditional. Meta will cut the daily limit to one hour and extend the night block to run from 10pm to 7am only if its rivals introduce the same measures. Part of the money also depends on their moves.
The company said so openly. “We want to ensure teens benefit from this new industry standard, but we cannot do it alone,” Meta said. It is using this to press TikTok, YouTube and Snapchat to adopt the same rules.
Earlier, in a separate trial in Los Angeles, Mark Zuckerberg called a ban on beauty filters “paternalistic”. Meta has now agreed to such a ban in the settlement.
Wall Street reads it as a win
The sum is a record, yet the shares barely moved. Analysts see the settlement as relief. Truist cut its price target to $763 but kept its buy rating. In its view, teens make up less than 1% of revenue and spend around an hour a day on the platform, below the new daily cap. It therefore expects no impact on engagement or revenue.
UBS reiterated its buy rating and spoke of the “removal of a key overhang on the stock”. In its view, the product changes do not touch the core business and are “more benign than potentially structural changes that could have limited Meta's ability to serve targeted ads”.
The maximum payout is also only a fraction of the company's market value, and far below the $1.4 trillion that the states originally sought.
Not everyone sees it as a closed chapter. James Grimmelmann, a law professor at Cornell, compared Meta to makers of asbestos and Agent Orange. The value of the precedent and the reputational impact could outweigh the sum that the market is currently taking in its stride.
For brands, reach to teens is shrinking
For brands, something other than the accounting sum matters more. The settlement does not change targeted advertising to teenagers as such, as UBS also points out. What changes is the volume and nature of their attention.
Time limits, night blocks, a non-personalised feed as a choice, and hidden likes shrink the engaged audience under 18 and the organic space through which content reaches it. According to an impact analysis, content discovery in the feed may hit limits for younger users, and direct messages, which do not count towards the time cap, are becoming the key channel for relationships with Gen Z customers.
For a brand buyer in the US, this means a smaller and harder-to-reach audience under 18 on Instagram and Facebook. Reaching it will need to be won through content and collaboration with creators rather than bought through frequency.
Europe is taking the same route through regulation
The described changes apply only in the United States. European teenagers are affected by Meta through a different route, the Digital Services Act. On 10 July the European Commission preliminarily found that the addictive design of Instagram and Facebook breaches the DSA, and it requires autoplay and an endless feed to be switched off by default.
Brussels takes the same line with other large platforms. In the US, the settlement has now come through the courts.
For brands and creators who reach audiences under 18 on Instagram and Facebook in the US, the default distribution surface is changing within months. Meta itself is now lobbying to make this the standard beyond its own apps.
Comments