Marketer Oscar Owen described a simple growth recipe on LinkedIn. MrBeast trims his old videos, and according to Owen his daily views rose by 34%. The catch is in the timing. In the same week YouTube changed how views are counted at all.
What MrBeast does with the archive
Owen describes how MrBeast's team shortens older videos and probably removes the sponsor segments with the lowest retention. He presents this as an estimate, not as a confirmed step. By his observation, more than half of the trimmed videos jumped in views shortly afterwards.
The mechanism Owen sees behind this is summed up in one sentence: “thumbnails and titles get the click. But retention decides how far YouTube pushes the video afterwards.” The thumbnail and title bring the click, but retention decides how far the algorithm sends the video. When you cut the spot where viewers drop off, retention rises and distribution should follow. Owen also adds that he has not tried this approach himself, and that it is only an observation about the world's largest creator.
YouTube now counts public views from the first frame
The change took effect on 24 August 2026 and applies to all formats: long videos, Shorts, podcasts and live streams. A view is now counted as soon as the video starts playing, with no minimum watch time. Previously, for long videos, an unofficial threshold of around 30 seconds of watching applied. Older videos keep their existing counts. The new rule applies only to views gained since then.
The original, stricter metric is now called engaged view. YouTube keeps it in Analytics, and money depends on it too. “An engaged view is defined as watching past that initial first frame or clicking to watch. This has been, and will continue to be, how you qualify to earn,” YouTube states. Monetisation and entry into the Partner Program therefore do not change. The public number is now a measure of reach, and the engaged view a measure of attention.
The trim and the new metric cannot be separated
Owen is aware of this conflict. He concedes that the rise in views is largely due to YouTube's new metric, and that with such a measure he would not be surprised if the trim itself had contributed too. That is precisely why this number does not show the effectiveness of the trim. In the same window in which MrBeast was pruning his archive, YouTube began inflating public views for everyone. One influence cannot be separated from the other using the public count.
What remains usable regardless of the metric is the engaged view. It measures whether the viewer stayed. It shows whether trimming a weak spot really lifted viewing, or merely rode along on the new definition.
The headline view count will keep growing after the change on its own, across all channels, including Czech ones, without a single change to the content. Whether a specific step really worked will be shown by the engaged view, the number that YouTube left unchanged.
Comments