Sky has agreed to buy the media and entertainment division of the British broadcaster ITV, and at the same time said how it wants the transaction to be read. In the press release it frames the deal as creating a “commercial streaming champion for the UK”. It is buying the business behind ITV’s channels and the ITVX streaming service. “This is a defining moment for British media and an opportunity to build a stronger future for two of the UK’s most loved and trusted brands,” said Sky Group chief executive Dana Strong.
Sky is owned by the American company Comcast. It is therefore taking over one of the last large independent commercial broadcasters in Europe and folding it into a platform that already helps shape both the advertising and subscription markets in Britain.
Deal structure and the excluded ITV Studios
The consideration has three parts. Sky will pay £1.2 billion in cash. According to the press release, ITV also transfers its own production company, Love Productions, and up to £0.2 billion linked to performance is added. In exchange, Sky gets the ITV channels, the ITVX streaming service and terrestrial broadcasting licences, which, according to Advanced Television, run until 2034. The ITV and ITVX channels are to remain free to access.
ITV Studios, the production arm of the group behind shows such as Love Island, is outside the transaction. Instead of acquiring it, Sky is signing a five-year content supply agreement worth £2.1 billion, which starts running after the acquisition is completed. Commissioned shows, however, will not count towards ITV’s quotas for independent production. ITV chief executive Carolyn McCall framed the sale as a continuation of an ongoing transformation. “ITV has successfully evolved in a rapidly changing media landscape, launching and scaling ITVX and developing ITV Studios into a major force in the global content market,” she said.
Where the value lies
Sky is buying reach and savings. According to the press release, ITV reaches roughly 40 million people each week and serves more than 16.5 million digital users every month. This is an audience that connects to Sky’s own distribution and advertising system.
By the end of the third year after completion, the combination is expected to produce annual savings of around £200 million on a recurring basis. Most of these are expected to come from marketing, technology platforms and more efficient content buying outside Britain. For ITV Studios, the separation means greater freedom. Analyst Paolo Pescatore noted that the production division can now focus on becoming a standalone global studio.
Consolidation in an age of fragmented attention
The logic of the deal is clear from one number. For commercial television in Britain to keep its weight against Netflix, YouTube and the public broadcaster’s iPlayer, it needs reach that it cannot grow on its own. Joining two brands with weekly reach in the tens of millions is an attempt to catch up with a scale that streaming and creator platforms have grown used to more quickly.
This is exactly where the British transaction touches a market that a brand buyer in Prague and elsewhere in Europe is watching. The attention that used to be aggregated by national television is now splitting among individual creators and their direct audiences. While broadcasters buy one another to assemble tens of millions of viewers a week, creators build the same audiences from the bottom up and without a merger. Consolidation from the top and aggregation from the bottom aim at the same commodity.
What comes next
Completion of the deal is subject to the usual conditions and regulatory approval. A merger of a national broadcaster with a reach of tens of millions of people and a major paid platform will attract the attention of competition authorities, and their interpretation will determine the shape of the resulting company.
For the European media market, this is another case in which an independent commercial broadcaster disappears under a larger commercial platform. The deal, worth €1.86 billion, concentrates British advertising and subscription revenue in a single player. The question it raises is not whether old television still has reach. It is who will own and sell that reach.
Comments